no it is not. not including wicket:extend means the child wants to completely override the markup of the parent.
-igor On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Antony Stubbs <antony.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to use markup inheritance without having to use > <wicket:extend> in the children? I'd like to be able to use MI without the > children html knowing. Just extending the super component should be enough > in a lot of situations. Particularly when extending panels which are naughty > and don't have <html><body> tags, and dont have any html which shouldn't be > in the result. > > I.e. can we have wicket default to simply effectively wrapping the entire > html contents in <wicket:extend> if there is no extend tag? > > ----- > ___________________________ > > http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Is-wicket%3Aextend-strictly-required-if-including-entire-html-child--tp20975395p20975395.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
