Seam and Wicket shouldn't compared. Seam is an integration framework (Hibernate, EJB3, JSF, jBPM, Quartz ...) , Wicket is a web framework. My current favorite frameworks are: Seam, Wicket and GWT Second rank: Tapestry, Grails
Erik van Oosten wrote: > > Glad that is out of the way :) > > Wicket and Seam are frequently compared. But I think it is not a > fair/possible comparison. We might as well compare TestNG with Mockito, > both are about testing but in an entirely different league. > > Seam's goal (as far as my humble knowledge goes) is targeted at > combining a variety of frameworks (in particular EJB3 and JSF). Focus is > on managing transactions and passing data around by storing and > retrieving it from an array of (untyped) contexts. (Please forgive me if > I am completely wrong.) > > Wicket's goal is to provide a natural OO environment to program a html > user interface. (Reusable UI components anyone?) Passing data around is > the responsibility of components but is typically done with (fully > typed) models. There is no need for contexts to keep state as the entire > components are kept as state. This is done by storing complete page > component hierarchies to a page map. Usually you have one page map per > session. Wicket's transaction support is no better or worse then the > next web framework. > > Regards, > Erik. > > > HHB wrote: >> What I would like to know? >> If Wicket supports multi-window/tap (beginning a new (what I can call?) a >> conversation)? >> Well, yes, it does >> http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc/org/apache/wicket/settings/IPageSettings.html >> Multi-window/tap isn't the gem of Seam, one of them >> :) >> We need to do more marketing for wicket guys:ninja: >> >> >> Erik van Oosten wrote: >> >>> Apart from letting you guess what a page map is (a collection of visited >>> pages) I think Ernesto gave a very decent response. So lets turn this >>> around: >>> >>> What would you like to know? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Erik. >>> >>> >>> PS. If that really is /the/ gem of Seam, you're in for a treat with >>> Wicket! ;) >>> >>> >>> HHB wrote: >>> >>>> This effects all the Wicket pages in the application, right? >>>> Seam folks advertise this feature as one of the gems of Seam framework, >>>> why >>>> Wicket doesn't shed more light on it? >>>> Common Wicket, no need to be humble this time :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Erik van Oosten >>> http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > > -- > Erik van Oosten > http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-tap-operations-in-Wicket-tp21125698p21141315.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
