IIRC, DropDownChoice requires a declaration like such:
IModel<List<? extends Foo>>
So, this should work:
IModel<List<? extends Foo>> choices = new AllUserModel();
I've been meaning to ask on the dev list why that is. Being forced to
declare the "? extends User" for a model like yours seems to add complexity,
and force a local variable. I haven't looked at it that much, but I know
that every time I've had to declare one, I always think "that's weird".
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Matt Welch <matt...@welchkin.net> wrote:
>
> I'm sure I should know this but I can't seem to get it right. I have a
> LoadableDetachableModel as follows:
>
>
> private class AllUserModel extends
> LoadableDetachableModel<List<User>>{
> protected List<User> load() {
> return userService().findAllUsers();
> }
> }
>
>
> I'm trying to use this as the Choices model in a DropDownChoice, but no
> luck. I'm sure I'm missing an <E> or a <T> or a<?> somewhere but I at a
> lost
> as to what the exact problem is. I've been a consumer of generics forever,
> but actually being on the creation side is a bit new to me.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/LDM-with-Generics-for-DropDownChoice-tp22155211p22155211.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
