Yep, I've been playing around with integration and will use it in a production deployment soon. So far, so good. I'm open to any feedback. I'm particularly happy with the PageStore implementation to use JSecurity's enterprise session management in a distributed environment - I needed to write it to support the case where Session objects did not reside in the same JVM where Wicket was executing.
I would also think JSecurity would be a better fit for Wicket as a whole since it does not require Spring. It integrates beautifully with Spring if desired, it is just not a requirement... Cheers, Les On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:36 AM, nino martinez wael < [email protected]> wrote: > Ahh ok, Just wrote Les... > > 2009/2/27 Maarten Bosteels <[email protected]> > > > I created a google-code project for Wicket-JSecurity integration, but > > unfortunately haven't had time to work on it. > > Les has already done some commits though. > > > > http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jsecurity/ > > > > Any help is welcome. > > > > regards, > > Maarten > > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Wayne Pope < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > In terms of SWARM etc its in the pre-generics stage. It didn't take > > > much to get it working with the latest wicket version mind. > > > It works fine, however it wan't what we needed in the end - we went > > > with the wicket.aurthorization package and rolled our own dynamic > > > acl-list/roles etc. > > > I had some promising converstions with Les Hazlewood from > > > jsecurity.org - that looks like another great package and more > > > flexible IMO. However Les was right in the middle of a move to NYC and > > > didn't have anytime to spend on doing a wicket version of jsecurity. > > > It might be worth pinging him a mail and see if he up for doing it > > > again. > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.glasscubes.com > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Nino Martinez > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I might pick it up (But since it's not something I need right now, it > > has > > > > low priority).. But was hoping that Wayne Pope would get back and > tell > > > whats > > > > state it is in.. > > > > > > > > Philippe Laflamme wrote: > > > >> > > > >> FYI: it's not clear what will happen with the wicket-security > package. > > > The > > > >> original maintainer sadly passed away last year and no-one has > > > officially > > > >> taken the torch. > > > >> > > > >> We've used both packages (auth-roles and swarm), but neither with > > > >> spring-security. We'd like to move to using spring-security using > > Swarm, > > > >> but > > > >> we haven't taken any step in this regard due to the package's > > > situation... > > > >> > > > >> Hoping the package gets an official maintainer soon. > > > >> > > > >> Philippe > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Markus Strickler wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi- > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> < > > > > > > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Security+Framework+Comparison > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> might be of interest. > > > >>> I've been using Auth-roles together with ACEGI in a project and it > > > >>> worked quite well. > > > >>> > > > >>> -markus > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Am 25.02.2009 um 21:23 schrieb M Goodell: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I would like to pose a question. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> We are looking at using Wicket as a platform for an upcoming > > project. > > > >>>> So far > > > >>>> we are *really* liking what Wicket brings to the table. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> In terms of security / securing a web application our first > thought > > > was > > > >>>> Spring Security. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> My question: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Does Spring Security "play nice" with Wicket and is it a viable > > > >>>> addition to > > > >>>> a Wicket Application? Or, what are other alternatives are > available > > > for > > > >>>> use > > > >>>> to investigate. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thank you in advance for any thoughts, comments and suggestions. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> M. Goodell > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and > > > >>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > > >>>> believed to be clean. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and > > > >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > > >>> believed to be clean. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
