Marat, It doesn't look like you received any response. I'd be happy to look at it. Could you file it as a patch on JIRA?
Thanks, Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Marat Radchenko < slonopotamusor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wicket pages/components can be either stateful or stateless. Wicket > manages hem transparently and it is very easy to write any complex > page you want. Stateful pages are much more powerful than stateless. > However that comes at a cost of using page store for their state. On > highload sites it is usually desired to minimize session-scope data, > and move it to request-scope. That's when Wicket users approach a task > of making stateful pages stateless. However stateless state (sic!) is > very fragile, if you add a single stateful component to a page, it > instantly becomes stateful (and you even might not notice that if your > other page content can work in both modes. And here comes my lovely > feature - @StatelessComponent. It is an annotation that you should put > on components which you want to be stateless. It doesn't do any magic, > it simply uses postComponentOnBeforeRender to assert that annotated > component (and all its children) are stateless. If it doesn't, an > exception is thrown, indicating what component tries to be stateful. > > This feature isn't large enough to be put in a separate project (just > one annotation and one listener) but wee find it extremely useful on > our project. > > I'd be happy to give it to Wicket project (or wicketstuff?) at > absolutely no cost (tests included) under same license as wicket > itself, if Wicket developers are interested in it. > > I'll file a feature request with a patch, if Wicket team finds this > useful in Wicket core. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
