Okay, I will see If I can figure out how :) I have never done that
igor.vaynberg wrote: > > please open a jira issue. > > -igor > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:32 AM, ulrik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> I have an issue with the DropDownChoice (wicket 1.3.4). >> >> Lets say I do this: >> >> List<Option> _options = getOptions(); >> someRenderer = new ChoiceRenderer() { >> ... >> } >> >> DropDownChoice _ddc = new DropDownChoice("dropDown", new >> Model((Serializable) _option),options, someRenderer); >> >> The Option class looks like this: >> >> public class Option { >> private String display_name; >> private String id; >> >> gettersAndSetters... >> } >> >> If I select an Option from the DDC, and that Option has id = -1, the >> AbstractSingleSelectChoice#getDefaultChoice(final Object selected) will >> interpret my choice as the protected static final String >> NO_SELECTION_VALUE >> = "-1" in AbstractSingleSelectChoice.java. >> >> The result will be that the "Choose one" option is visible in the DDC. >> Shouldn't the NO_SELECTION_VALUE be customizable? >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-NO_SELECTION_VALUE-static-field-tp22451464p22451464.html >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-NO_SELECTION_VALUE-static-field-tp22451464p22471221.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
