Peter,
I have experienced similar problems just recently.  I didn't narrow it down
to the fact that the links were the problem, as you have, though!  I have
been racking my brains trying to figure this thing out.  My page is similar,
a table with lots of cells in them that are links.  I've turned off CSS and
other stuff trying to find the bottleneck.  I didn't think for a moment that
it might be the links.

James

2009/4/16 Peter Gardfjäll <[email protected]>

> Hi all,
>
> I am working on a wicket application intended to be executed both on
> FF3 and IE7.
> While working on this application I have discovered that the rendering
> of some pages are a lot slower in IE.
> The pages that were significantly slower on IE have a couple of things
> in common: they are ajax-enabled and have lots of links.
> These pages all appear to freeze for a while after all data has been
> transferred, but before the page becomes responsive.
>
> The reason (or at least one of the reasons) is that wicket-ajax.js,
> which gets pulled in whenever an Ajax component/behavior is added to a
> page, registers a function
> (addDomReadyEvent(Wicket.Focus.attachFocusEvent)) that traverses all
> {input,select,a,textarea,button} tags in the DOM tree when the page
> has been loaded.
>
> I timed this function for one of my pages (containing a single big
> table with around 300 rows, with each row having about six links).
> When the function is registered, the fireDomReadyHandlers in
> wicket-event.js takes 2400 ms to execute, compared to 700 ms when not
> registered. In firefox, the corresponding numbers are about 470 ms and
> 400 ms.
>
> Hence, there seems to be quite a performance penalty involved in
> loading ajax pages with lots of links in IE7.
> I'm a bit worried about this overhead, particularly since I have a
> rather fast machine (a lot better than most of the end users anyway).
> I would not be surprised if clients see double page load times.
>
> Have anyone on this list experienced similar problems?
> Is this a known issue? (I have not been able to find anything similar
> on the mailing list)
> Any suggestions or pointers are welcome.
>
> best regards, Peter
>
> /PS By the way, I am using wicket 1.3.5.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to