Hi,

After trying a lot I finally was able to show and work (more or less).

A warning: Never call your appl/portlet-name with the same name
as the url-mapping, if not it won't work that was the main problem.

My new problem I'm using DatePicker from wicket-extensions/wicket-date
in a form, the date picker is not working (I mean the button that shows the
calendar
and let you choose a date in a friendly way)

Not found something useful in mailing-lists so
I added supports mime-type: text/javascript and application/x-javascript to
portlet.xml, but still not working.

Any idea of what is happening, or a solution to this problem

Thanks very much in advance
tonio

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Rob Sonke <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We're running wicket 1.4m2 on liferay 5.2.x and that's working fine. We
> only use the sun portlet container instead of the one from Liferay. Search
> the mailinglist and the liferay forum for the steps which you'll have to
> perform.
>
> Rob
>
>
> On 4/21/09 4:45 AM, Tonio Caputo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've tried with liferay 5.2.2 tomcat6/tomcat55/jetty6.1.14, and no
>> success.
>>
>> In both tomcat, application is deployed, but when put into a page, the
>> application
>> is not shown.
>>
>> In jetty, the application doesn't get deployed.
>>
>> In all cases there is no log, or any message that let me know what is
>> happening.
>>
>> Any help will be greatly welcome
>> Wicket is really a nice framework (the nicer I've seen), and it would be
>> wonderful if I can use it instead JSP framework provided by liferay.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> tonio
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Tonio Caputo<[email protected]>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi wicket users,
>>>
>>> I'm a newbie in wicket and portlets, I'm involved in trying to find a
>>> web framework to create portlets in a liferay portal, my duty is to
>>> try wicket and see if it works.
>>>
>>> Versions   wicket 1-4-rc2
>>>                  liferay 5.2
>>>
>>> After reading  Issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620,
>>> it
>>> seems clear
>>> that this is possible.
>>>
>>> Reading wicket portlet examples, I realized there is a lot of stuff in
>>> WicketPortlet, that
>>> is a bit difficult to understand for a newbie for both things
>>> (wicket/portlet).
>>>
>>> I'll just like to know, if this is the correct example after WICKET-1620,
>>> or perhaps there
>>> is a simpler one.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> tonio
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to