Sorry, AbstractCheckBoxModel.

On 4/26/09, Liam Clarke-Hutchinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wrapping models in models is one of my favourite things about Wicket.
> :D That said, the AbstractCheckboxModel in Wicket extensions can be
> handy for one-off deviations from normal checkbox behaviour.
>
> On 4/25/09, mallet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Much thanks... works like a charm.
>>
>>
>> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>>
>>> class InverseBooleanModel implements imodel<boolean>
>>>  private final imodel<boolean> delegate;
>>>
>>>   public inversebooleanmodel(imodel<boolean>delegate) {
>>> this.delegate=delegate; }
>>>   public boolean getobject() {
>>>       return !delegate;
>>>   }
>>>   public void setobject(boolean o) {
>>>    delegate.setobject(!o);
>>>   }
>>>   public void detach() {
>>>     delegate.detach();
>>>   }
>>> }
>>>
>>> add(new checkbox("cb", new inversebooleanmodel(model)));
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ryan LaHue <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I'm scratching my head trying to figure out the best way to reverse the
>>>> behavior of a checkbox, i.e. display an unchecked box when the model
>>>> behind
>>>> is true, and a checked box when the model behind is false.  I don't
>>>> want
>>>> to
>>>> negate all my domain objects' getters/setters to accomodate this.
>>>>
>>>> I was going to override the CheckBox.getConverter class to point to an
>>>> extension of CheckBoxConverter with an overridden convertToObject
>>>> method
>>>> and
>>>> simply reverse the:
>>>> if ("on".equals(value) || "true".equals(value))
>>>>            {
>>>>                return Boolean.TRUE;
>>>>            }
>>>>            else
>>>>            {
>>>>                return Boolean.FALSE;
>>>>            }
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately the CheckBox.getConverter method is marked final, so this
>>>> is
>>>> not a possibility.  I could override the onComponentTag method but I do
>>>> not
>>>> think it would be a good idea since there is a lot going on in there.
>>>>
>>>> Alternatively if there was a simple way to negate the value of the
>>>> setter/getter in a PropertyModel I think that would do the trick, i.e.
>>>> new CheckBox("checkbox", new PropertyModel(domainObject, "!blue"));
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Reversing-checkbox-behavior-or-negating-a-property-model-expression-tp23218428p23223605.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to