Hi all, I moved to wicket 1.3.6, the lastest before 1.4, without any luck. What I did next, it was to cut the code that was bother me and It is working now. Of course, I am afraid that this could have colateral effects. This is the code,
if (group.hasRawInput()) { final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray(); if (input != null) { for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) { if (uuid.equals(input[i])) { tag.put("checked", "checked"); } } } } If I liked to write a Jira with an example, What would I do? I've never done this before. On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst < martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure. > > Martijn > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them > > from the top of my head :) > > > > -igor > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus > > <fernando.wer...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Igor, > >> I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known > >> bug? > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira > >>> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly. > >>> > >>> of course patches are applied even quicker :) > >>> > >>> -igor > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus > >>> <fernando.wer...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > Hi!, > >>> > I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face. > >>> > > >>> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and > several > >>> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked > boxes > >>> are > >>> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed. > >>> > I verified several times if there was a problem between models > and > >>> It > >>> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, > according to > >>> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know > how to > >>> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people > >>> asking > >>> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0. > >>> > > >>> > (check.class) > >>> > if (group.hasRawInput()) > >>> > { > >>> > final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray(); > >>> > > >>> > if (input != null) > >>> > { > >>> > for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) > >>> > { > >>> > if (uuid.equals(input[i])) > >>> > { > >>> > tag.put("checked", "checked"); > >>> > } > >>> > } > >>> > } > >>> > } > >>> > else if (collection.contains(getModelObject())) > >>> > { > >>> > tag.put("checked", "checked"); > >>> > } > >>> > > >>> > Thanks in advance. > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Fernando Wermus. > >>> > > >>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus > >>> > > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Fernando Wermus. > >> > >> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > -- Fernando Wermus. www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus