Got it! Thanks! Jing -----Original Message----- From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 19:42 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
you shouldnt store those kind of objects (services or application "static" objects) use LoadableDetachableModel for that On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:56, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM) <j...@besitec.com>wrote: > Well, the RequestLogger is not a pure service. It is also a data object. > It is actually a combination of service and data object. > > Regard > Jing > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:53 > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable? > > Would you use new Model<UserService>(getYourUserService())? It's the > same thing - they are services, not data objects. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT > DEHAM)<j...@besitec.com> wrote: > > Hello johan, > > > > Because I want to use the information hold in the RequestLogger as an > > object in a model. Something like this: > > > > New Model<RequestLogger>(getRequestLogger()); > > > > Thx > > Jing > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:43 > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable? > > > > why would you serialize the request logger? > > there is only one and that is attached to the Application it shouldnt > be > > serialized. > > > > Just like that Settings object is also not serialize able or the > > implementations of ISessionStore > > > > johan > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:38, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM) > > <j...@besitec.com>wrote: > > > >> Hello all, > >> > >> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that > > the > >> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement > > this > >> interface for logging more individual information. > >> > >> My requirement is: > >> > >> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site > > status > >> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable > >> interface. > >> > >> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement > >> Serializable? > >> > >> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4 > >> > >> Thx & best regards. > >> Jing Ge > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
