Use Lombok (http://projectlombok.org/), it allows you to generate
setters and getters through annotations:
@Getter @Setter private String name;
/Casper
David Chang wrote:
Martin,
Thanks for your input. My intention is how to get rid of these boring
setters/getters from service beans that are usually generated only for the
purpose of spring-injection.
Cheers!
--- On Sun, 9/27/09, Martin Makundi <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
From: Martin Makundi <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com>
Subject: Re: avoid setters / getters by using ?
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Sunday, September 27, 2009, 3:55 PM
At least in wicket you can access the
fields themselves using propertymodels.
**
Martin
2009/9/27 David Chang <david_q_zh...@yahoo.com>:
Hello,
I have Wicket+Spring application. It has a service
object which has a few DAO members. I can use Spring's
autowiring to avoid mentioning the DAO dependencies for the
service bean. However, in the Java program for the service
bean, I still have to add setters and getters for each DAO
member, which I don't like. How can I avoid these setters
and getters? Using AOP? Any examples?
I understand that this question is not strictly a
Wicket, but I definitely want to ask my Wicket friends
here.
Thank you!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
