I think the problem is that you are using the "volatile" keyword when you should be using "transient".
bht wrote: > > So I wonder, what is the situation with SerializableChecker > complaining about that volatile field not being Serializable. Is this > a bug or do I miss anything? > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Transactions-with-RuntimeException-tp26220780p26227378.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
