Found my problem. I needed to be using a DynamicWizardModel, not a
WizardModel. This lets me add the steps as required and therefore get
access to the version of the model at that stage of the process.
I'd done this before, just had to paw through my personal svn to find
how I implemented it.
Yes, it was a 'Doh!' moment.
Tx-
John-
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:21 AM, John Armstrong <siber...@siberian.org> wrote:
> I believe my models are dynamic and self-contained. For example one is
> a Serviceorder that lives in the net.pnc.model.Serviceorder class. I
> have one instance of this in my wizard that is shared between all
> screens. All properties of Serviceorder are private to Serviceorder
> and accessed via getters/setters. So for example:
>
> add(new TextField("email", new PropertyModel(theOrder, "email")));
>
> where 'theOrder' is the wizard scoped instance of a Serviceorder.
>
> That seems correct to me, can you confirm?
>
> I see in the wicket examples project there is a Wizard that uses a
> StaticContentStep for just this case. This leads me to believe that
> the only way to accomplish this task is to do the same and basically
> wrap that entire last step into the properties file and feed it the
> model? Feels wrong to me..
>
> John-
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:07 AM, bgooren <b...@iswd.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like you are using static models instead of dynamic models.
>>
>> E.g. if you use Model.of("test"), the model is essentialy self-contained.
>> Whereas if you have a property called "value" in your wizard and you use
>> new PropertyModel( Wizard.this, "value" )
>> , the model will depend on the value of the "value" property.
>>
>> Bas
>>
>>
>> John Armstrong-3 wrote:
>>>
>>> It may just be late and I am missing the obvious but..
>>>
>>> I have a wizard. The last step needs to be a confirmation step however
>>> it is constructed when added to the WizardModel in the Wizard
>>> constructor and at this stage all of the backing models are empty
>>> since, well, the user hasn't done anything.
>>>
>>> This means when I access models on the confirmation step all of the
>>> model data is empty (it was built by wicket earlier in the process).
>>>
>>> What am I missing? This is a common use pattern so I am doing
>>> something wrong since obviously the form has the data as back/forth
>>> show it just fine. The only work-around I can think of is to not add
>>> this step and then insert this step at the end myself (once the
>>> objects are populated). Seems hacky though.
>>>
>>> Tx
>>> John-
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Wizard-and-confirmation-screens-tp26570806p26572871.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
