jira issue... -igor
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Luther Baker <lutherba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not a huge thing but would it make sense to remove the <licenses> ... entry > from the wicket prototype? > > <licenses> > <license> > <name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name> > <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url> > <distribution>repo</distribution> > </license> > </licenses> > > Luckily, I stumbled across this before committing but I was close to > publishing a new project to an GPL3 repository and this pom entry would have > been confusing. > > Per the Maven pom guidelines <http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Licenses>: > > *Note that a project should list only licenses that may apply directly to > this project, and not list licenses that apply to this project's > dependencies.* > > Again, no biggie. Maybe it is no big deal. > > -Luther > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
