Can you tell me what this means "The palette itself cannot be ajaxified because it is a panel and therefore does not receive any javascript events."? Would a palette without javascript require full page loads?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]>wrote: > you can build a palette that works without javascript but the user > experience will probably be poor > > -igor > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Chuck Brinkman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As you can guess I'm new to wicket. Seems very good so far. I found > this > > Palette component and thought it might work well for me but I need to > make > > some modifications. So I started to dig in. I noticed that the > component > > uses js. I thought wicket was just java and just html. I do realize > that > > is a little but of marketing hype but could this component have been > > implemented without any js? I read this in the Palette.java source file: > > The palette itself cannot be ajaxified because it is a panel and > therefore > > does not receive any javascript events. I don't know what this means. > Does > > this mean that the click events to move data around could not be sent to > the > > server? Can this only be done using js? Or was js selected because it > > would be too slow otherwise? If I just need to RTFM just say so. I > would > > appreciate some insight if someone has time. Thanks > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
