Ninio, At a quick glance, these also work fine for me, but you're probably safest to use the links I gave in my post above (the project is hosted at Google Code, use the SVN there). You may need to change any WiQuery dependencies to refer version 1.0 in your POMs as they wrote the original sample for 1.0-m2. Of course, if you do find issues, please go ahead and raise them on the correct issues page [1] so someone can take a look, but give a bit of detail to help the developer replicate your issue.
Regards - Cemal jWeekend OO & Java Technologies, Wicket Consulting, Development, Training http://jWeekend.com [1] http://code.google.com/p/wiquery/issues/list On 2 February 2010 10:54, nino martinez wael <nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cemal I expirience alot of bugs running the examples, from here > http://www.wiquery.org/wiquery-examples-1.0/ permgen error :/ > > 2010/2/1 Cemal Bayramoglu <jweekend_for...@cabouge.com> >> >> Josh, >> >> Did you run the demos available at the WiQuery site [1]? >> odlabs' "Agile Task Lists" demo [2] uses some layout mechanism if I >> remember correctly. >> If you have concrete ideas on how to extend the way WiQuery (and >> jQuery) supports this, we are very open to suggestions. We are also >> discussing setting up a WiQuery plugins project where ideas like this >> can evolve/incubate and be considered for inclusion in the core once >> they are evaluated. >> Interestingly, some people complain that UI presentation should be >> done in a declarative way (eg in XUL like languages) and not in a >> procedural way, so they may consider specifying layout in Java code >> (rather than in Wicket's native XHTML & CSS way) a step in a strange >> direction. >> >> Regards - Cemal >> jWeekend >> OO & Java Technologies, Wicket >> Consulting, Development, Training >> http://jWeekend.com >> >> [1] http://wiquery.googlecode.com >> [2] >> http://wiquery.googlecode.com/svn/examples/wiquery-presentation-examples/ >> >> On 1 February 2010 05:28, Josh Kamau <joshnet2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi guys; >> > >> > I would like to get your opinions and also share some of my views. I >> > have >> > been test-driving wicket for a couple of weeks now and i found it quite >> > impressive. However , i would like to say that IMHO wicket is more >> > suitable >> > for creating websites as opposed to RIA applications. I would like to >> > make >> > applications that look and feel like desktop applications but running on >> > a >> > browser, i have a solid GWT background and i used to make this kind of >> > applications but alot of work is involved. Should we not have a ria >> > framework based on wicket? It could just be some nice CSS based theme or >> > an >> > intergration with something like extJs or something like this. WiQuery >> > is a >> > great step in this direction but it lacks components for making the main >> > application layout. >> > >> > In the meantime, i will be trying out Vaadin. >> > >> > Regards. >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
