Cemal, Please feel free to send me a patch if anything looks crazy. I have had a heck of a time getting all this stuff working. It's a delicate balance (like herding cats)! :) The OWB folks have checked in my patch to fix one of the issues, but we're still hammering out another.
Thanks, James On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Cemal Bayramoglu < jweekend_for...@cabouge.com> wrote: > Olivier, > > I got Jame's stuff [1] up and running (thanks James) with just a few > small changes to the POMs - maybe he has stuff already in his local > Maven repo that is no longer on the main public repos) working with > little effort. > > If you'd like to make (and maintain ;-) an archetype out of those > (based on Apache implementations), or a Galssfish based one, we would > be happy to include those on our LegUp page [2][3]. > > Regards - Cemal > jWeekend > OO & Java Technologies, Wicket > Consulting, Development, Training > http://jWeekend.com > > [1] http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-cdi/trunk > [2] http://jweekend.com/dev/LegUp > [3] http://code.google.com/p/legup/ > > > On 30 March 2010 10:24, Olivier Bourgeois > <olivier.bourgeois....@gmail.com> wrote: > > I do also think that it's because Wicket is not a managed framework : > > everything is simple unmanaged POJOs except for your classes extending > > WebPage which are "managed". I've juste had a quick look at JSF 2.0 and > > never worked with it - but I worked with Wicket - so I did not expected > > Wicket JEE6 integration to be a drop in replacement for JSF. I do think > > Wicket is an alternative framework for JEE6, not a replacement of the > > reference framework. > > > > On one hand JSF2 assumes that you are running a JEE6 AS, so it is tightly > > integrated with CDI, and you got all the cool stuff like injection, > scopes, > > bean validation, etc. On the other hand, Wicket doesn't assume anything > > except a web container implementing the servlet spec, so it can't have > all > > the cool stuff of CDI because it's not built around CDI. > > > > I think the next step to make Wicket JEE6 integration going further is to > > provide some Maven quickstart archetypes, the Weld team is looking for > > contributors : > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/WeldArchetypesInTheSpotlight > > > > Now that I have something working, and when I will have some spare time, > my > > next step is to create an archetype for Glassfish. And if some people on > > this list have some time, their help is of course welcome :) > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
