What happened to the groovy wicket builder project? I know it was on hold until anonymous inner classes were going to be supported which were added in groovy 1.7 irrc.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Erdinc <kocam...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Or use wicket as I explained on this page :) > > http://java.dzone.com/articles/faster-development-easywicket > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: James Carman <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: Fri, April 16, 2010 2:05:12 PM > Subject: Re: Type Inference for Wicket 1.4 > > And, nothing is stopping you from doing something like this in your > own code. I have a class called ComponentUtils where I put stuff like > this. I have two methods: > > public static <T extends Serializable> IModel<T> modelOf(T bean); > public static <T extends Serializable> IModel<T> modelFor(Class<T> > beanClass); // This will instantiate the object for you. > > I also have: > > public static void detachAllModelFields(Component c); > > With static imports, you can just use these methods like they're in > your classes. > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Jeremy Thomerson > <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > > This is the key - and it has been discussed before (in the many grueling > 1.4 > > conversations). The short of it is that with private constructors > there's a > > huge change and an inability to extend. And without the private > > constructors, the static methods are dumb and extraneous because you > would > > need hundreds of them, and you would need even more of them on your > extended > > model and component classes. > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Thomas Kappler > > <thomas.kapp...@isb-sib.ch>wrote: > > > >> On 04/15/10 13:06, James Perry wrote: > >> > >>> I can sympathise with that. However I don't think it would be a > >>> maintenance nightmare if the constructors are set to private; but that > >>> would mean a dramatic API change for such convenience and I'm guessing > >>> you're not willing to do this. > >>> > >> > >> Apart from the huge change for questionable benefit, that would also > remove > >> inheritance, which is essential to the Wicket way, because you can't > extend > >> a class with private constructors only. If you can, get a hold of Bloch, > >> Effective Java, and read the insightful chapter on the constructor vs. > >> static factory method trade-off. > >> > >> -- Thomas > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Best, > >>> James. > >>> > >>> On 14 April 2010 17:01, Igor Vaynberg<igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> you are going to have one factory method for each constructor, its > >>>> going to be a pita to maintain. not something we will want in core. > >>>> > >>>> -igor > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:51 AM, James Perry > >>>> <james.austin.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I am looking to migrate from Wicket 1.3 and Wicket 1.4 and I really > >>>>> like the type-safe goodies but I do not like its verbosity. I was > >>>>> thinking of writing a patch that provides factories to improve the > >>>>> brevity by type inference of the generic invariant. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is an example of my idea: > >>>>> > >>>>> Model<MySuperLongNameForASimpleFooObject> model = Model.newModel(); > >>>>> > >>>>> public static<T> Model<T> newModel() { > >>>>> return new Model<T>(); > >>>>> } > >>>>> > >>>>> Feedback welcomed. :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> James. > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Thomas Kappler thomas.kapp...@isb-sib.ch > >> Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Tel: +41 22 379 51 89 > >> CMU, rue Michel Servet 1 > >> 1211 Geneve 4 > >> Switzerland http://www.uniprot.org > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > >
