ohk... will check. Regards, Apple Grew my blog @ http://blog.applegrew.com/
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote: > you use iheadercontributor to write out the url to the resourse, which > i think will point to the javascriptpackageresource. > > -igor > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Apple Grew <appleg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That's a good point. :) > > > > BTW if i implement my own IHeaderContributor how will take advantage of > > wicket's js code stripper and compressor provided by > > JavascriptPackageResource? > > > > Regards, > > Apple Grew > > my blog @ http://blog.applegrew.com/ > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> if you have a million hit site you can probably afford the hosting :) > >> > >> -igor > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Tim L Casey <tca...@cataphora.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > In terms of hosting it is measurable. Each byte of request for a > million > >> > hit site is 10Mbit of line cost. > >> > > >> > That being said most latency is about connections and not amount of > data. > >> > At least in terms of speed up I would look first at reducing things > like > >> > frames, then resources, then size. > >> > > >> > Inlined ajax, yeah /shrug with the caveat for hosting solutions. > >> > > >> > tim > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] > >> > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:08 PM > >> > To: users@wicket.apache.org > >> > Subject: Re: Strip header contributors from Ajax response. > >> > > >> > amd this bloating has caused a noticeable slowdown in your site's > >> > response times? how much latency is it adding to the response? > >> > > >> > that said, you can always output it using iheaderresponsecontributor > >> > and add an check if you are inside ajax or not using request.isajax() > >> > > >> > -igor > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Apple Grew <appleg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Hi Igor, > >> >> > >> >> It is not that duplicates items are getting rendered. What I want is > >> that > >> >> the Js should be rendered ONLY when rendering in non-Ajax mode. In > Ajax > >> > mode > >> >> the Js code should be stripped out. As these Js codes are not > executed > >> > when > >> >> in Ajax response so it doesn't make sense to render them there. This > >> >> unnecessarily bloats the response. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> Apple Grew > >> >> my blog @ http://blog.applegrew.com/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Igor Vaynberg > >> > <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> wicket will filter duplicate contributions for you and even though > >> >>> they are rendered they are not executed. if you are writing out > >> >>> javascript directly you can set a string id which uniquely > identifies > >> >>> the contribution and wicket will also filter by that. > >> >>> > >> >>> -igor > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Apple Grew <appleg...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > I have a component which contributes Js headers. This component is > >> also > >> >>> > rendered by AjaxRequestTarget. The problem is that when rendering > >> ajax > >> >>> > response the Js codes too are getting rendered. These Js codes > were > >> >>> already > >> >>> > contributed when this component first rendered (in non-Ajax mode). > >> >>> > > >> >>> > To fix this what I initially did was that in the onBeforeRender > >> method > >> > of > >> >>> > the component I was checking if the response NOT isAjax then add > the > >> >>> header > >> >>> > contributors, else, remove them. This was working fine, but > problem > >> is > >> > if > >> >>> I > >> >>> > want to implement this is other components I would have to copy n > >> paste > >> >>> the > >> >>> > codes. So I decided to implement a behavior. I added all the > header > >> >>> > contributors to that behavior and it was supposed to do the job of > >> > adding > >> >>> n > >> >>> > removing the header contributors. But we can't modify hierarchy > from > >> >>> > beforeRender of behavior so I am now stuck. Furthermore, this > >> approach > >> > is > >> >>> > not capable of removing JS contributed by super calsses of the > >> >>> componenet. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Please suggest. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Thanks and regards, > >> >>> > Apple Grew > >> >>> > my blog @ http://blog.applegrew.com/ > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
