I figured it out. If the object doesn't have a getter, the setter won't be called, and instead it just injects the value into the field.
That seems like a bug, do I need to prepare a quickstart? D/ On May 13, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Cemal Bayramoglu wrote: > Send a QuickStart (simplest one you can create that demonstrates this) > and we'll take a look. > > Regards - Cemal > jWeekend > OO & Java Technologies, Wicket > Consulting, Development, Training > http://jWeekend.com > > > > On 13 May 2010 08:17, Douglas Ferguson <doug...@douglasferguson.us> wrote: >> I am seeing some unexpected behavior. >> >> I have a page with a text field and a link on it. >> The text field is backed with a property model >> The text field has an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on it. >> >> The link then persists the object that the property model is wrapping. >> >> I never see the setter get called for the object. >> The setter massages the data. I see the raw data, as entered in the browser, >> get stored to my db. >> I also never hit my breakpoint int he setter. >> >> D/ >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
