A -1 vote would be a vote against dropping support. You seem to be making an argument for dropping it. Plus it wasn't your -1, was it?
On Sep 2, 2010 3:41 AM, "Wilhelmsen Tor Iver" <toriv...@arrive.no> wrote: >> Usually -1 votes should be accompanied by a justification if you want >> them to be considered seriously. Why are you voting -1? > > Moving portlet support to a separate project (instead of core or extensions) makes more sense, that is at least one justification. > > (I guess this would in effect be making a "portlet bridge" like IIRC the support pre-1.4-m2 used. But then it could be moved over to the Apache portlet bridge project as a whole, if that is still active?) > > Popularity of JSR-168/286 seems to be waning, and people instead use portals implemented directly on top of a content system instead... > > - Tor Iver > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >
