Ok, I still don't know how interest is to have it in the core. You can do it
at an session extension, like:

1- providing some API

MySession extends Session{
    private ThreadLocal<Object> sessionSerializationRestrictor = new
ThreadLocal<Object>();
    public void inhibitSerializationOnThread(Object restrictor){
        sessionSerializationRestrictor.set(restrictor);   }

    public void removeSerializationRestriction(){
        sessionSerializationRestrictor.set(null);    }

    private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out) throws
IOException {
        if (sessionSerializationRestrictor.get() != null) {
            throw some exception explaining that the restrictor do not allow
this serialization;
        } else {
            out.defaultWriteObject();
        } }}

2- providing some Page.IPageSerializer that calls
inhibitSerializationOnThread and removeSerializationRestriction before and
after the page serialization.

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Erik van Oosten <e.vanoos...@grons.nl>wrote:

> That won't work in general as some servlet containers (like tomcat)
> serialise the session to disk when its idle for too long.
>
> What I meant is that when the page is serialised, it _must_ not contain a
> reference to session.
>
>
>  but than some other developers can complain because they are deliberated
>> serialializing some session.
>>
> They won't complain when the exception text specifies why this is wrong.
> See Martijn's e-mail in this discussion thread for why it is wrong.
>
> Regards,
>     Erik.
>
>
> Op 17-11-10 21:05, Pedro Santos schreef:
>
>  I think it is to specific. You can override the Session on your app an
>> catch
>> this situation like:
>>
>>     private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out) throws
>> IOException {
>>         if (Application.get() != null&&
>> Application.get().getConfigurationType().equals(Application.DEPLOYMENT)) {
>>             log.info("Session is being serialized in the development
>> environment, which is an not a desirable behavior.");
>>         }}
>>
>> but than some other developers can complain because they are deliberated
>> serialializing some session.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Erik van Oosten<e.vanoos...@grons.nl
>> >wrote:
>>
>>> Shouldn't serialization fail when it references session/application?
>>> Perhaps only in development mode.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>    Erik.
>>>
>>> Op 16-11-10 19:03, Igor Vaynberg schreef:
>>>
>>>  added a log warning to property models when they reference session.
>>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my SMTP compliant software
> Erik van Oosten
> http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos

Reply via email to