ops, I miss that, can u send a quickstart? The last version is 1.4.14, you
can use
<dependency>
<groupId>org.wicketstuff</groupId>
<artifactId>inmethod-grid</artifactId>
<version>1.4.14</version>
</dependency>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Soneira
<daniel.sone...@joyn-it.at>wrote:
> PagingToolbar is not my code.
> It's a class of inmethod-grid (wicketstuff project). So I have no influence
> on that. That's what I would do if it _was_ my code though ;)
> Maybe inmethod-grid adapts the new onConfigure / onInitialize methods. I'm
> currently using 1.4.1 which I _think_ is the latest official release.
>
>
> On 14.12.2010 18:52, Pedro Santos wrote:
>
>> use the onConfigure to set the paging-toolbar
>>
>> onConfigure(){
>> setVisible( getDataGrid().getTotalRowCount() != 0);
>> }
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Daniel Soneira
>> <daniel.sone...@joyn-it.at>wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> In the private method Form#isMultiPart the visitor algorithm does not
>>> check
>>> for components that implement IFormVisitorParticipant.
>>>
>>> Here is my use case (I've been debugging quite some time to find the
>>> source
>>> of recent problems I've encountered):
>>>
>>> Within a form I have a nested In-Method PagingNavigator (with a read-only
>>> text field) that returns FALSE for
>>> IFormVisitorParticipant#processChildren.
>>> Also the grid uses some filtering criteria that the user can change (some
>>> text fields - also children of the form).
>>>
>>> Hierarchy:
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> form
>>> -- filter
>>> -- criteria-1...x
>>> -- grid
>>> -- paging-toolbar
>>> -- paging-navigator [IFormVisitorParticipant -> processChildren()
>>> returns false]
>>> -- text-field
>>> -- search-button
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> When the form is submitted (via SEARCH button) the following happens:
>>>
>>> Form#isMultiPart() tries to determine if that text field is visible in
>>> the
>>> hierarchy; which at some time (through recursion) asks the toolbar. The
>>> paging-toolbar contains the following code:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> @Override
>>> public boolean isVisible() {
>>> return getDataGrid().getTotalRowCount() != 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This queries the data provider which at that point can not use the
>>> current
>>> filtering criteria - because they are not submitted yet. Therefore the
>>> results in the grid are wrong.
>>> The text field is ignored for validation / updating of the model. That
>>> works as expected.
>>> In my option the text-field should not be visited at all since its parent
>>> (navigator) specifies otherwise.
>>>
>>> Note, that prior to wicket 1.4.12 I didn't have this problem (I was using
>>> 1.4.10 before where there is no check for visibleInHierarchy in
>>> Form#isMultiPart).
>>> I've looked at the source code of Form#isMultiPart in 1.4.14 and 1.5.M3
>>> and
>>> both seem to be the same.
>>>
>>> Should I create a JIRA issue for that (I think it's a bug) or is there an
>>> easy workaround that I miss?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Daniel Soneira
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
