I noticed today that StringResourceModel could be slightly nicer to use if the Object[] parameter used by the underlying MessageFormat was replaced with a vararg in the StringResourceModel constructor. Sure enough, there was an old thread that touched on this topic. The defaultValue would have to move in a couple of the constructor signatures. Thoughts? Worth doing?
Old thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg24385.html Tested briefly in my code with: public class VarArgResourceModel extends StringResourceModel { public VarArgResourceModel( String resourceKey, IModel<?> model, Object... parameters ) { super( resourceKey, model, parameters ); } } Enrique --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
