On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:53:21 +0100
Wilhelmsen Tor Iver <[email protected]> wrote:
> So the best is to create a proper class that is nested but not a
> member class:
>
> private static class BackSomePage {
> private PageReference pageRef;
> public BackSomePage(PageReference pageRef) {
> this. pageRef = pageRef;
> }
> @Override protected void onPreviousButtonClicked() {
> setResponsePage(pageRef.getPage());
> }
> }
That's what I feared this would come down to. I think this is rather
awkward to use and is definitely a step backwards from 1.4.
I can see the PageReference being necessary - but if one uses
PageReference instead of Page.this, what would the harm be in still
using the anonymous class, apart from the slightly larger memory
footprint?
Carl-Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
