2011/3/25 <mzem...@osc.state.ny.us> > <Hi, > < > <I made a new test (serving a png and a js) with current trunk and the gap > is > <much smaller now: tomcat is 25% faster on average. > < > <Attila > > Attila can you elaborate on your tests? Are you comparing the difference > between using a resource reference (js) and image component (png) in > wicket vs linking straight the to the files in html? If so, what > relevance does whether the static files are in META-INF or WEB-INF have? > Not that much because if I am correct the extra overhead is introduced by > having wicket process the resource and spit out the markup... > > Hi!
In speed test I compared the serving time of the static resources directly (and not the rendering time of the url-s in the wicket page or the page itself). With jmeter I calculated the average time for serving 20k times the same resource trough Servlet 3.0 meta and trough wicket. Attila
