Hi,

I think something like Jersey, Resteasy will be better for your needs.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Niranjan Rao <nhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We are evaluating libraries like ExtJs or SmartClient to build the
> application. This sort of deviates standard wicket paradigm as most of
> the responses will be in json or xml format and will not need .html file
> associated with it.
>
> Personally I don't like idea of such kind of applications, but
> admittedly some of the widgets these libraries provide are very good and
> in many of the cases all we have to do is provide proper datasource.
>
> Will wicket be good choice for backend of such kind of applications. We
> already have some services in our wicket application that does generate
> json responses etc, so it's certainly possible.
>
> Another concern I have is security - which might be mute concern. My
> understanding (which is almost nothing) of wicket security is, security
> is applied on page level or request level as it uses servlet filters and
> really does not care what kind of output request is generating or
> whether it has corresponding html page or not. Is this right
> understanding? For the calls these libraries will be making, we need to
> make sure we don't serve the data if user is not signed in etc.
>
> Just wanted to gather what others think before we finalize the decision.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Niranajn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to