Looks like crap to me.. On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> missing a green dot in "Framework extensions are done in Java" - what > else are the done in? > > missing a green dot in "Application oriented" - wicket is both page > and application oriented - depends on how you want to build your > app... > > not sure why in the IDE department we get only two stars...you dont > need any plugins to make it easier to work with wicket other then some > very minor things. > > why is there nothing in "Number of downloadable add-ons"? are they > saying there are zero addons available to download? > https://github.com/wicketstuff/core alone contains plenty of addons > downloadable from the maven repo. and there are lots of other > libraries published by people. > > my two cents. > > -igor > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:02 AM, shetc <sh...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > https://vaadin.com/comparison An extensive RIA technology comparison > matrix > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/An-extensive-RIA-technology-comparison-matrix-including-Wicket-tp3941573p3941573.html > > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
