Hi Igor, Exactly, that is the reason because I'm proposing to make getObject final. I think it's not ok to override getObject.
What do you think? 2011/11/18 Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> > getObject() is what defines the contract of load(). if we make it > overridable the user can then break the load() function - for example > by not calling it from the override. > > why would you want to override getobject()? > > -igor > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Tito <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm wondering if it is ok not to do 'final' this method. > > Correct me if I'm wrong but I think it is not normal to Override this > > method because we always have to Override load(). > > > > It's just a question to know what do you think. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Norberto > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
