Hi,
So you want to not have <a> (because this is what
.setRenderBodyOnly(true) does) and in the same time you want to set a
class an that non-existing tag ?!
The easiest way is to remove the call to .setRenderBodyOnly(true).
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Stoch <daniel.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to modify tag attribute (eg. add a CSS class) of
> component which has set renderBodyOnly flag to true?
> When using component.add(new AttributeModifier(...)) it has no effect,
> because a tag in which this class attribute is appended is not
> rendered in HTML (because of setRenderBodyOnly(true)).
>
> Here is an example:
> LinkContainer is a component (extends Panel) which has
> setRenderBodyOnly(true).
>
> <wicket:panel>
> <a wicket:id="link"><wicket:container wicket:id="linkContent">[link
> content]</wicket:container></a>
> </wicket:panel>
>
> Somewhere inside a page or panel:
> add(new LinkContainer("link", ...).add(new AttributeModifier("class",
> Model.of("my-link-style"))));
> But of course this " class='my-link-style' " will not be rendered anywhere.
>
> I want to add a class attribute to contained <a> tag but using a
> behavior which can be added to the whole LinkContainer. Is it any
> simple solution to achieve this?
>
> --
> DS
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
