Make sure your filter mapping for your other filter is after the mapping for wicket filter.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Dan Retzlaff <dretzl...@gmail.com> wrote: > If your ThreadLocal is needed within Wicket, shouldn't your filter run > *before* WicketFilter? > > Does your filter use any Wicket classes that require something in > o.a.w.ThreadContext? > > The basic design should work. We use a filter to manage a ThreadLocal > Hibernate Session for open-session-in-view. > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM, YK <linux_2...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to make example using wicket 1.5.4 and spring work but I keep >> having this exception: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: There is >> no >> application attached to current thread... >> >> My example defines also a servlet filter that is applied just after the >> WicketFilter in web.xml. >> This filter uses ThreadLocal to set/unset a variable around each >> request/response cycle. >> >> I've noticed that if I disable the filter, my example works fine, but I >> really need it to to pass a variable via the ThreadLocal: (static final >> ThreadLocal<Map<String, Serializable>> THREAD_OBJECT_CONTEXT = new >> ThreadLocal<Map<String, Serializable>>();) >> >> >> Any idea about why wicket fails to accept such a filter please? >> >> Is there a workaround please? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/org-apache-wicket-WicketRuntimeException-There-is-no-application-attached-to-current-thread-tp4447781p4447781.html >> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
