Martin, does it really makes any difference? Lack of stateless navigation does ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1086 ) Anyway, I explained solution in my prev letter. Thanks!
On 21 August 2012 16:59, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > The Google Code repo contains 1.5 but the deployed app is using pre-1.5 > version. > I can bet on this. > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Alex Shubert <alex.shub...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Martin, >> http://wicket-tree.googlecode.com/svn/repo/wicket-tree/wicket-tree-parent/0.5.0/wicket-tree-parent-0.5.0.pom >> Again, no 1.4 at all. Not in one place. Moreover, >> '?wicket:interface=:0:1:::' doesn't means 1.4 is in action. Just take > > Is there a reason why you don't trust me ? :-) > wicket:interface is no more used in 1.5+, unless the application adds > it explicitly. Wicket (the framework) doesn't use it anymore. > >> a look at event listener implementation. >> >> About the problem: the page I gave link for is really stateless but it >> is not meant to be, it just happened. If user choose any other tree >> renders version number eager to appear. >> The most Wicket problem right now is it's occult state. Wiki is >> hopelessly outdated, most of the examples refer to 1.2.-1.3 version... > > Most of them are actually still valid. > There are new pages labeled with "wicket15" and "wicket6" which refer > to the new features in 1.5 and 6.0 respect. > >> >> >> If someone wonder how to determine why his page is stateful here is >> the solution: > > There is StatelessChecker in wicket-devutils for this task. > >> if (!isPageStateless()) { >> visitChildren(Component.class, new IVisitor<Component, >> Component>() { >> @Override >> public void component(Component component, >> IVisit<Component> iVisit) { >> if (!component.isStateless()) { >> LOGGER.info("Stateful component found [ " >> + component.getClass().getName() + " : " >> + component.getMarkupId() + " ]"); >> >> // iVisit.stop(component); >> } >> } >> }); >> } >> >> If in need of test detection, extract visitor to separate class and >> instantiate pages with WicketTester. >> >> >> On 21 August 2012 15:47, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Sorry for being stubborn but having '?wicket:interface=:0:1:::' in the >>> url means that this is Wicket pre-1.5 ;-) >>> >>> I guess Sven will join this conversation later today and explain in >>> more details. >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Alex Shubert <alex.shub...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Martin >>>> with all my respect but their build script uses >>>> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.wicket</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>wicket-core</artifactId> >>>> <version>${wicket.version}</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> >>>> ${wicket.version} derived from parent pom where >>>> <wicket.version>1.5.0</wicket.version> >>>> >>>> So, >>>> 1. no stateless form >>>> 2. it is 1.5 >>>> 3. it's pretty easy to ensure yourself just by looking into code >>>> http://code.google.com/p/wicket-tree/wiki/RunningExamples It even >>>> can't be compiled under 1.4 >>>> >>>> Anyway: what does your answer has to do with my question? One more >>>> time: how that example manage not to increase page version shown in >>>> url on every tree node selection? >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21 August 2012 14:39, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> The deployed examples use Wicket 1.4. >>>>> >>>>> http://wicket-tree.appspot.com/?wicket:interface=:0:1::: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Alex Shubert <alex.shub...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> They are using >>>>>> Form<Void> form = new Form<Void>("form"); >>>>>> >>>>>> and still no version in url on round-trips. Also, FilterForm from >>>>>> Wicket API doesn't extends StatelessForm while your answer states that >>>>>> must be the case. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 21 August 2012 14:20, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> Use StatelessForm instead. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Alex Shubert <alex.shub...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Recently I found wicket tree control >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://wicket-tree.appspot.com/nested >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and one there is a thing I can't understand: while the page contains >>>>>>>> Form it looks like not versioned. I mean there are no version number >>>>>>>> in a url. >>>>>>>> How does it work then? Is there any clear way to build pages >>>>>>>> containing Form without explicit version number in url except some >>>>>>>> black magic involved ( modified MountedMapper ) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>>> Alexandr >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>> jWeekend >>>>>>> Training, Consulting, Development >>>>>>> http://jWeekend.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best regards >>>>>> Alexandr >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>> jWeekend >>>>> Training, Consulting, Development >>>>> http://jWeekend.com >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards >>>> Alexandr >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Grigorov >>> jWeekend >>> Training, Consulting, Development >>> http://jWeekend.com >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards >> Alexandr >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Best regards Alexandr --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
