OK, I see
public RedirectRequestHandler(final String redirectUrl, final int status)
{
if ((status != HttpServletResponse.SC_MOVED_PERMANENTLY) &&
(status != HttpServletResponse.SC_MOVED_TEMPORARILY))
{
throw new IllegalStateException("Status must be either 301 or 302, but was:
" + status);
}
I'm not sure why there is such restriction. Maybe Igor can explain, git
blames him.
What is your reason to use code 303 ? How its semantics are better than 302
in your case ?
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Oliver Zemann <[email protected]>wrote:
> But the warning is thrown by wicket itself that 303 is not allowed. So i am
> very sure this is a wicket problem. I use jetty 9 as web server. So the
> problems with 301/302 could be related to jetty, but the not working 303 (i
> get that exception in wicket) is some kind of problem in wicket.
>
>
> 2013/4/4 Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not familiar with http code 303 (see other) but if there is a problem
> > then you should ask in the forums of the used web container or web
> browser.
> > Wicket just sets response headers via Servlet APIs but the actual work is
> > done by the container - to set the header, and by the browser - to read
> the
> > value and interpret it.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Oliver Zemann <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I created a wicket quickstart:
> > > https://github.com/olze/WicketRedirect.git
> > >
> > > The SC_SEE_OTHER which is defined in the RFC for HTTP 1.1 (iirc Jan.
> > 1997)
> > > was explaining that this should work (sending a post to the application
> > > which uses GET to get the page from the redirected URL) is not working,
> > it
> > > says only 301 and 302 are allowed.
> > > Why?
> > >
> > > When using 301 it works as expected when cookies are disabled. When
> > cookies
> > > are disabled and 302 is used, it redirects to the local site and not to
> > the
> > > external one because of the missing Location header. Is this a bug or
> > did i
> > > understand something wrong? I thought 302 should be used when wicket
> > should
> > > redirect to an external URL.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Oliver
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Grigorov
> > jWeekend
> > Training, Consulting, Development
> > http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
> >
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
