hi
quick question about clustering: am i right to believe that putting
session/pagemap data in a memcached-like storage has advantages over the
tomcat session clustering in terms of latency and robust failover behaviour?
i mean, the latter obviously has the data nearby (when assuming sticky
sessions) whereas the first needs to grab it from (and push it to)
external storage every time even though it is far more selective about
what it needs.
i was wondering if tomcat session clustering can effectivly update only
the dirty parts of the session data?
i'd love any kind of feedback on that topic INCLUDING 'depends'-answers :)
cu uwe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
