Could it be related to
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10763780/putting-div-inside-p-is-adding-an-extra-p
?
I've seen odd behavior before when using block-level elements inside p-tags.
However, from your e-mail it's not entirely clear what your html looks
like. "Subcomponents of mainpanel were wrapped in p-tags" does sound
like you may have divs inside p tags.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind regards,
Bas Gooren
Op 9-9-2013 4:28, schreef Colin Rogers:
Wicketeers!
I have an odd bug, that has been resolved, but I it doesn't explain what and
why the issue existed - and with a view to avoiding the issue in future, I
thought I should seek some wisdom! :)
Basically - I have a application where the 'main panel' is replaced as a link
is clicked (along with other panels, too) - oddly, when I hit certain links
repeatedly, instead of the mainPanel simply replacing the old version and
updating, it produced duplicates - no duplicates in the other panels, just the
mainPanel. Meaning I had the same panel repeated from each click down the page.
After tons of reverting on code, hacking and experimenting, I finally found the culprit... yep;
<p> tags. When any of my sub-components of mainPanel were wrapped in <p> tags, it caused
the parent to duplicate instead of replace. Replace the <p> tag with a <div> and everything
works fine. So obviously I have a perfectly good solution!
Does anyone have an explanation for this? I'm totally stumped as to why <p>
tags would cause issues in the DOM?
Cheers,
Col.
EMAIL DISCLAIMER This email message and its attachments are confidential and
may also contain copyright or privileged material. If you are not the intended
recipient, you may not forward the email or disclose or use the information
contained in it. If you have received this email message in error, please
advise the sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the message
and any associated attachments. Any views, opinions, conclusions, advice or
statements expressed in this email message are those of the individual sender
and should not be relied upon as the considered view, opinion, conclusions,
advice or statement of this company except where the sender expressly, and with
authority, states them to be the considered view, opinion, conclusions, advice
or statement of this company. Every care is taken but we recommend that you
scan any attachments for viruses.
