Hi Jan, The problem is that Jetty 9.1 (and any JSR356 impl) is built with Java 7 so it cannot be part of Wicket 6. But maybe it is not such a big problem - Jetty 9.0 is also built with Java 7. Feel free to file a ticket if you want -javax module to be downported to Wicket 6.x. It seems it works ...
Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Jan Moxter <jan.mox...@innobix.com> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > thanks for the input. Using the wicket-native-websocket-javax 7.0.0-M1 in > conjunction with the 6.15.0 modules and configuring my embeded jetty > correctly ( :-) ) I got it to work. > > jan > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Martin Grigorov" <mgrigo...@apache.org> > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 11:53:13 PM > > Subject: Re: Jetty 9 Websocket > > > Hi, > > > Jetty 9.1 implements JSR356 and the recommended way is to use > > wicket-native-websocket-javax module. > > > On May 23, 2014 4:38 AM, "Jan Moxter" <jan.mox...@innobix.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hallo, > > > > > > > > > right now if you download a jetty server in the version 9 you get > > > the > > stable version 9.1.5.v20140505. The API for the websocket > > implementation > > did change between 9.0 and 9.1. so that the > > wicket-native-websocket-jetty9 > > module does not work any more. > > > > > > > > > - are you planning to update the module to work with jetty 9.1 or > > > do you > > propose a new module wicket-native-websocket-jetty9.1? > > > - do you have this on your roadmap? > > > > > > > > > For my own application I already generated my own " > > wicket-native-websocket-jetty9.1" I could provide the code if wanted > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > >
