Hi Ernesto,

I didn't get the question.

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks! Whose PortletLike on
>
> https://github.com/martin-g/component-rendering-default/blob/master/src/main/java/com/mycompany/HomePage.java
> ?
> PanelA?
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a demo app with Wicket 6.x:
> > https://github.com/martin-g/component-rendering-default
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Here is a possible solution *now*:
> > >
> > > portletLike.add(new AbstractTransformerBehavior() {
> > >   @Override public CharSequence transform(Component c, CharSequence
> > > output) {
> > >      try {
> > >        c.internalRenderComponent();
> > >      } catch (Exception x) {
> > >        return "default result";
> > >      }
> > >    }
> > > });
> > >
> > > Something like this should do it.
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I see... you may have already streamed content --> Maybe same
> interface
> > >> serves to mark a component as "do not stream anything till the end",
> or
> > >> stream the contents to an intermediate buffer... but what I way above
> > >> might
> > >> not make sense as well.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > >> > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > @Martin,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Just a (maybe stupid) idea:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > 1- Mark some component as ISafeFail
> > >> > > 2- If rendering fails take Component_onfail.html and render it
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > As I said earlier this is not so trivial.
> > >> > The failure may happen in the middle of the rendering and the
> content
> > >> > collected so far in RequestCycle#getResponse() could be invalid
> HTML.
> > >> > Appending anything (loaded from a file or generated on the fly) is
> not
> > >> > really a solution.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4321
> > >> > > > this is the ticker I meant
> > >> > > > it suggests to restart the rendering completely for the whole
> page
> > >> and
> > >> > > this
> > >> > > > is not enough
> > >> > > > I'll see what kind of changes would be needed to accomplish
> this.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Martin Grigorov
> > >> > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > There is no support for this, even in 7.x.
> > >> > > > > I remember Carl-Eric Menzel asking for the same functionality
> > >> before
> > >> > > ...
> > >> > > > > Behavior#onException() sounds like something similar but there
> > is
> > >> no
> > >> > > way
> > >> > > > > to suppress the bubbling of the exception at the moment.
> > >> > > > > The bigger problem is that the rendering can fail in the
> middle,
> > >> i.e.
> > >> > > the
> > >> > > > > component can have written some response already and then
> fail.
> > If
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > written response is proper HTML then it is OKish. But if some
> > tag
> > >> is
> > >> > > not
> > >> > > > > closed then the rendering of the complete page may fail.
> > >> > > > > So if we try to add this functionality we will have to use
> > >> temporary
> > >> > > > > Response objects for the rendering of each component to be
> able
> > to
> > >> > > throw
> > >> > > > > away whatever it has produced before failing.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Usually the problem is related to the component's model. A
> > >> workaround
> > >> > > for
> > >> > > > > you could be to use a wrapper Model that returns "empty data"
> > when
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > underlying model throws an exception.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > >> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > >> > > > > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >> Hi,
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Tobias Gierke <
> > >> > > > >> tobias.gie...@voipfuture.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> > Hi,
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> >> Wouldn't it be possible to "embed"  the failing prone
> > porlets
> > >> > > inside
> > >> > > > >> >> iframes so that each one is a Wicket page?
> > >> > > > >> >>
> > >> > > > >> > I already thought about this but the page uses quite a lot
> of
> > >> > fancy
> > >> > > > >> > CSS/Ajax/Javascript (portlets are rendered in a grid with
> > >> > > configurable
> > >> > > > >> > row/column count, drag'n'drop to move them around etc.) and
> > I'd
> > >> > > rather
> > >> > > > >> not
> > >> > > > >> > touch the existing code if there's a Java-side only
> solution
> > >> ;-)
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> I do not know of any :-(
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Another possibility is build each client entirely on
> JavaScript
> > >> and
> > >> > > use
> > >> > > > >> Wicket just as a service layer... not very Wicket like but
> you
> > >> would
> > >> > > not
> > >> > > > >> have this problem.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > Cheers,
> > >> > > > >> > Tobias
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Tobias Gierke <
> > >> > > > >> >> tobias.gie...@voipfuture.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > >> >>
> > >> > > > >> >>  Hi,
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> In our web application we have a dashboard-like homepage
> > that
> > >> > > > >> displays a
> > >> > > > >> >>> number of user-configurable 'portlets' (which are really
> > just
> > >> > > > ordinary
> > >> > > > >> >>> Wicket components and have nothing to do with the Portlet
> > >> spec).
> > >> > > I'm
> > >> > > > >> >>> looking for a way of preventing the application from
> > becoming
> > >> > > > >> unusable in
> > >> > > > >> >>> case one or more of these portlets continuously fail to
> > >> render
> > >> > > > >> because of
> > >> > > > >> >>> some internal error/bug.
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> We're currently using a custom RequestCycleListener with
> > the
> > >> > > > >> >>> onException()
> > >> > > > >> >>> method redirecting to a generic error page, thus when
> > >> rendering
> > >> > > of a
> > >> > > > >> >>> 'portlet' fails the user will never get to see the
> homepage
> > >> and
> > >> > > > always
> > >> > > > >> >>> end
> > >> > > > >> >>> up on the error page - which is obviously not really
> > >> desirable.
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> Is there a way to to hook into Wicket's rendering cycle
> so
> > >> that
> > >> > I
> > >> > > > can
> > >> > > > >> >>> provide some default markup in case rendering of a
> > component
> > >> > > > (subtree)
> > >> > > > >> >>> fails with a RuntimeException ?
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> I understand that this maybe be very tricky since the
> > >> component
> > >> > > > >> subtree
> > >> > > > >> >>> might've rendered partially and thus internal state will
> be
> > >> > > > >> inconsistent.
> > >> > > > >> >>> It would probably require serializing the initial state
> of
> > >> the
> > >> > > > >> component
> > >> > > > >> >>> (subtree) before rendering starts and reverting the
> wholle
> > >> > subtree
> > >> > > > to
> > >> > > > >> its
> > >> > > > >> >>> initial state once a RuntimeException is thrown.
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> We're running Wicket 1.5.12.
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> Thanks in advance,
> > >> > > > >> >>> Tobias
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> --
> > >> > > > >> >>> Tobias Gierke
> > >> > > > >> >>> Development
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> VOIPFUTURE GmbH   Wendenstraße 4   20097 Hamburg,
> Germany
> > >> > > > >> >>> Phone +49 40 688 900 164 Fax +49 40 688 900 199
> > >> > > > >> >>> Email tobias.gie...@voipfuture.com   Web
> > >> > > http://www.voipfuture.com
> > >> > > > >> >>>   CEO Jan Bastian
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>> Commercial Court AG Hamburg   HRB 109896, VAT ID
> > DE263738086
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > >
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> > > > >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >> users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>>
> > >> > > > >> >>
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> --
> > >> > > > >> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>

Reply via email to