On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chris Colman <[email protected]> wrote: > Some of those look very nice indeed. How were they created?
Just Keynote (a presentation tool for the Mac). > It sounds like people have been toying with this for a long time. Yup. > Perhaps it never happened because we wanted to go from the current site > to mega awesome in one single step - which was always too much effort. Not really, but if you change the styling you want to fix the copywriting as well. Some of the copy on our site is as old as Wicket. > I think a multi phase approach might have more chance of success - as I > said in my immediate previous post if we could live with jekyll source > for phase one (even though it may not be ideal) then we can keep most of > the current content source 'as is' and simply choose a decent modern > Bootstrap CSS template to re-render it in to deliver the best 'bang for > buck' possible at this early stage. Bootstrap would be too standard and anonymous and would ultimately be a ball and chain. A little .less and responsiveness can easily be achieved without going bootstrap. > Or does Jekyll have a fairly fixed translator that provides little > customizability? Jekyll is fully customizable. It's just a translator from markdown to HTML with templates and includes. Martijn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
