Hi,

On Oct 6, 2016 15:22, "Manfred Bergmann" <m...@software-by-mabe.com> wrote:
>
> martin-g wrote
> > On Oct 5, 2016 7:52 PM, "Manfred Bergmann" &lt;
>
> > mb@
>
> > &gt; wrote:
> >>
> >> OK, thanks for you reply.
> >>
> >> What's the state of Wicket-Foundation?
> >> I mean, is it mature enough for a large enterprise application?
> >
> > Dunno.
> > Someone from the community contributed it a while back.
> >
> >>
> >> I assume that Wicket-JQuery-UI and Wicket-Bootstrap is?
> >
> > I'd say - yes!
>
> Bootstrap has a very nice baseCSS. Is this applied to the standard Wicket
> widgets automatically?
>
> If I want to use a widget from elsewhere, say jQuery or Kendo, does it
clash
> with it's CSS?

All kendo css classes are "k-" prefixed, so I don't think there will be
conflicts. For jQuery ui, there are "ui-" predixed iirc.

Just a warning however, both frameworks are big/complete frameworks, so
will end up with 2 big js and 2 big css...

>
> Manfred
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Your-opinion-on-ShieldUI-tp4675649p4675685.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>

Reply via email to