Yep, Unfortunately It's not that easy to fix /wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/pages/BrowserInfoPage.java/html I believe both need to be consistent Or maybe we can leave only JS version and remove static one?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > See org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxClientInfoBehavior works. > Looking at it I think you can easily extend it by using monkey-patching > for Wicket.BrowserInfo.collect() > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello Martin, > > > > One question before I'll start with this enhancement: Can pure JS > solution > > be used here? I can both create FORM and send all data via POST without > any > > markup ... > > Would it be OK? > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > OK, will do, will take some time :) > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Try the PR and see whether it helps you to achieve what you need. > > >> If it does then we will process it sooner. > > >> If it doesn't then make it work :-) > > >> > > >> Martin Grigorov > > >> Wicket Training and Consulting > > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > OK, how can I help? > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Martin Grigorov < > > mgrigo...@apache.org> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056 > > >> > > It is almost possible to extend the BrowserInfoPage. It needs just > > >> little > > >> > > more work. > > >> > > > > >> > > Martin Grigorov > > >> > > Wicket Training and Consulting > > >> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < > > >> solomax...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Does it make any sense? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > > >> > solomax...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > And maybe protocol+context (or window.location.href) :) > > >> > > > > mod_proxy, mod_rewrite can change the URL a lot :) > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > > >> > > solomax...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> Hello All, > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> I wonder is there any way to extend gathered > > >> org.apache.wicket.pro > > >> > > > >> tocol.http.ClientProperties? > > >> > > > >> I would like to have port in addition to hostname > > >> > > > >> Or maybe I can provide PR to wicket so it would have this > info > > by > > >> > > > default? > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> WDYT? > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> -- > > >> > > > >> WBR > > >> > > > >> Maxim aka solomax > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > >> > > > > WBR > > >> > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -- > > >> > > > WBR > > >> > > > Maxim aka solomax > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > WBR > > >> > Maxim aka solomax > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > WBR > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
