2017-09-19 9:35 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>:

> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
> > 2017-09-19 7:16 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <martin.grigo...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > On Sep 19, 2017 6:22 AM, "Martin Makundi" <
> > > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > IMO it's better to big mang whole wicket to drop joda date. All wicket
> 8
> > > without joda.
> > >
> > >
> > > Said the person who still uses Wicket 1.4 for his apps...
> > >
> >
> > Yes, incremental change is a pain so we big bang 1.4 ->8.
> >
> >
> > > Everyone wants to see the Big Bang and this might be the reason to see
> > > Wicket 8.0.0 in 2020.
> >
> >
> > Dropping joda should not significantly slow down development.
> >
>
> True, if your name is Stephen Colebourne and you know both APIs by heart!
> I personally had to ask Google and StackOverflow.com several questions for
> what I've done so far in the branch mentioned above.
>
> My vote on whether to merge this rafectoring to master branch will depend
> on the diff in wicket-examples.
>

Let's try it first. If it does not pass we can drop joda locally. So long
as it is not a transient dependency it's doable.

>
>
> > >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > **
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > 2017-09-18 22:43 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Martin Makundi <
> > > > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is it possible to also drop joda from wicketstuff for consistency?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > IMO, the WicketStuff module must be exactly the same as the one in
> > Wicket
> > > > 7.x.
> > > > Any changes in the API should be done in Wicket 8.x.
> > > > This way when users migrate their apps to 8.x they can decide to take
> > the
> > > > short route and use the WicketStuff module.
> > > > Later they can invest in reworking their code to the new API and use
> > > again
> > > > org.apache.wicket:wicket-datetime
> > > > The WicketStuff module README should say that it will be available
> only
> > > for
> > > > Wicket 8.x lifecycle, to prevent double maintenance.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > 2017-09-17 22:09 GMT+03:00 Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 to move legacy code to WicketStuff. For 'legacy code' I mean
> all
> > > the
> > > > > > code based on yui library and class StyleDateConverter which is
> > > > tailored
> > > > > on
> > > > > > Joda time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 16/09/2017 14:13, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Since I do not use wicket-datetime in my apps I also wanted to
> > break
> > > > it
> > > > > >> hard by replacing Joda-Time with Java 8 classes.
> > > > > >> But people who use it expressed concerns that it will be hard to
> > > > migrate
> > > > > >> this way. Everyone will have to do the same for his/her
> > application.
> > > > > >> I remember Igor even suggested to have univeral API that will
> work
> > > > with
> > > > > >> java.util.Date, Joda-Time and Java 8!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> IMO the easiest thing that could be done is to copy the current
> > code
> > > > to
> > > > > >> WicketStuff, as https://github.com/wicketstuff/wicket1.5-tree,
> > and
> > > > > rework
> > > > > >> wicket-datetime to use Java 8 APIs.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hello Martin,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I tried to continue this work, but it seems I need some
> > information
> > > > > >>> before I can proceed
> > > > > >>> Could you please tell me What was the goal of these changes?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I would remove joda-time, and use LocalDate, LocalTime instead
> of
> > > > Date
> > > > > >>> As I can see you are using ZonedDateTime ...
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > mgrigo...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Yes, if finished on time!
> > > > > >>>> Wicket 7 requires Java 7
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Rakesh A <
> > > > iamrakes...@rediffmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Is it going to be for Wicket 8 only ?
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Regards,
> > > > > >>>>> Rakesh.A
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>> Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n
> > > 4.nabble.com/Users-forum-
> > > > > >>>>> f1842947.html
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > ---------
> > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>> WBR
> > > > > >>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ---------
> > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to