Hi,
just my 5 Cent but I hate conversion methods to transform JPA objects to DTO -
why not place in the JAXB annotations into the same class - this prevents a lot
of code and please no DozerBeanMapper ;-)
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 01.07.2019 um 21:19 schrieb Zbynek Vavros <zbynekvav...@gmail.com>:
>
> I don't want DTO - entity relation, the idea here is to make clear
> separation of JPA entities and DTOs that can be send over REST/RMI
> call/serialized.
>
> So you don't think there is some "wickety " magic to make this less painful?
> Own class is sure thing, if nothing else than for tests...
>
> Zbynek
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:22 PM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> preferably your dto would hold a batch instance instead of the name only.
>>
>> In your case you have to do the mapping somewhere, the renderer is a
>> good place for that.
>> Move it into its own class file so it won't hurt so much :P.
>>
>> Have fun
>> Sven
>>
>>
>>> On 01.07.19 14:45, Zbynek Vavros wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't have any specific use-case for this but I'm interested on how to
>> do
>>> this properly.
>>>
>>> There is a DropDownChoice that displays list of Batches.
>>> Now the display option should be "id" and "name" concated together and
>>> the DropDownChoice selection model will be only the name.
>>>
>>> Batch is simple entity/DTO with Long id and String name, something like:
>>>
>>> public class Batch implements Serializable {
>>> private Long id;
>>> private String name;
>>> }
>>>
>>> DropDownChoice is added to form that has CompoundPropertyModel for
>> example
>>> like this:
>>>
>>> public class ResultDto implement Serializable {
>>> private String batchName;
>>> }
>>>
>>> the only solution I can think of is custom IChoiceRenderer but looks
>> nasty
>>>
>>> List<Batch> batches = Lists.newArrayList();
>>> List<String> names
>>> =batches.stream().map(Batch::getName).collect(Collectors.toList());
>>>
>>> add(new DropDownChoice<>(" batchName ", names, new
>>> IChoiceRenderer<String>() {
>>> @Override
>>> public Object getDisplayValue(String name) {
>>>
>>> Batch batch1 = batches.stream().filter(batch ->
>>> name.equalsIgnoreCase(batch.getName())).findFirst().get();
>>>
>>> return batch1.getId() + " - " + batch1.getName();
>>> }
>>>
>>> @Override
>>> public String getIdValue(String object, int index) {
>>> return String.valueOf(index);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @Override
>>> public String getObject(String id, IModel<? extends List<?
>>> extends String>> choices) {
>>> return batches.get(Integer.valueOf(id)).getName()
>>> }
>>> }));
>>>
>>> Surely there has to be a better way to do this!
>>>
>>> Zbynek
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
