Not sure if it helps or it is what are you looking for but this is how I do
it.
I have abstract base class that
- sets Wicket application into Spring ApplicationContext
- creates WicketTester
- uses static configuration class to create mocks of required Spring
components in ApplicationContext
that are in turn injected into Wicket components using @SpringBean
@RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration
@ImportAutoConfiguration(WicketAutoConfiguration.class)
public abstract class BaseWicketTest {
@Autowired
protected WebApplication wicketApplication;
@Autowired
protected ApplicationContext applicationContextMock;
protected WicketTester wicketTester;
@Before
public void baseSetUp() {
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(wicketApplication,
"applicationContext", applicationContextMock);
wicketTester = new WicketTester(wicketApplication);
}
@Configuration
@ComponentScan({"my.package"})
@Import(AnotherConfiguration.class)
public static class Config {
@Bean
UserDetailsService userDetailsService() {
return mock(MyUserDetailsService.class);
}
}
}
Then all test classes extend this abstract base class.
@RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
public class WicketComponentTest extends BaseWicketTest {
// autowired mock
@Autowired
private UserDetailsService userDetailsServiceMock;
@Test
public void testSomething() {
// stub userDetailsServiceMock using Mockito when()
// perform wicket component initialization and do tests (submit
form, perform ajax etc)
// validate userDetailsServiceMock using Mockito verify()
}
}
Does everything I need and seems pretty clear to me but maybe someone here
has a better setup.
Zbynek
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:41 AM Tom Götz <t...@richmountain.de> wrote:
> We have both, a service layer and a persistence layer (each in it's own
> maven module). We use Spring Data Jpa repositories for the persistence
> layer and Liquibase for managing DB changes. When testing the Wicket layer
> I don't want the complete persistence and service layer to be initialized
> by Spring (e.g. no need for persistence context initialization and
> Liquibase), but would prefer to work with mocks. Is that enough information
> for you or what else should I provide?
> Tom
>
> > Am 10.07.2019 um 11:00 schrieb Andrei Kondratev <
> andrei.kondra...@unimarket.com>:
> >
> > Hi Tom!
> >
> > It depends on the implementation. If you have a service level it's not
> necessary to mock persistence, but enough to mock services and inject them
> (if you use @Autowired annotation).
> >
> > Could you please give a bit more examples of what you're trying to test?
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:56, "Tom Götz" <t...@richmountain.de> wrote:
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> we have a Spring Boot based webapp (Wicket 8.4 with wicket-spring-boot
> 2.1.6) and would like to create a base test class for our Wicket tests. For
> testing, we would like to mock the service and persistence layer (e.g. with
> Mockito). Is there a good example for that purpose?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Tom
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> > --
> > ANDREW KONDRATEV
> > TECHNICAL LEAD
> >
> >
> >
> > MOB +64 210 492 674
> > EMAIL andrei.kondra...@unimarket.com
> > www.unimarket.com
> >
> > Simple and easy-to-use software that brings all your procurement into
> one place.
>
