Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:41 PM Thomas Heigl <tho...@umschalt.com> wrote:

> Thanks Sven!
>
> I think the solution is good enough for now.
>
> Would it be possible to do a 9.0.0-M5.1 release for this? If so, I would
> give it another try on production.
>

It would be easier to copy the class temporarily in your project and fix
the import in YourApplication.java.
You can revert this change with the next release.


>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:57 PM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > I've pushed a change for
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6769 to master.
> >
> > I'm not sure about the API right now, but it allows you to easily use
> > any other map implementation.
> >
> > Caffeine's Cache#asMap() should work fine with here, although I didn't
> > test it myself.
> >
> > Have fun
> > Sven
> >
> >
> > On 12.04.20 20:41, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > > Hi Sven,
> > >
> > > I was thinking about this as well.
> > >
> > > SoftReferences worked well in my application. G1GC seems to start to
> > evict
> > > them when -XX:InitiatingHeapOccupancyPercent is reached. In my case,
> when
> > > the heap is around 60% full.
> > > But as you said, there is no real control over which references are
> > evicted
> > > and it is much harder to monitor the current state of the memory map.
> > >
> > > We are already using Caffeine extensively and your suggested solution
> > would
> > > allow me much more control over the cache.
> > > We could still use SoftReferences with Caffeine if we wanted to in
> > addition
> > > to setting a global limit on cache size and an eviction policy.
> > >
> > > To avoid calling an overridable method from the constructor you could
> > add a
> > > Supplier<Map<String, MemoryData>> argument. I usually choose a
> > > supplier-based approach in such cases.
> > >
> > > Let's go for this solution!
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:57 PM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Thomas,
> > >>
> > >> I've did a little research on using SoftReferences for caches:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/264582/is-there-a-softhashmap-in-java
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://jeremymanson.blogspot.com/2009/07/how-hotspot-decides-to-clear_07.html
> > >>
> > >> The experts seem to agree that depending on the GC to clean up your
> > >> cache is a bad idea:
> > >>
> > >> - you can't control which elements in the cache are evicted first
> > >> - eviction happens only when the system is low on memory
> > >>
> > >> Best option would be using Guava's CacheBuilder:
> > >>
> > >>     https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/CachesExplained
> > >>
> > >> IMHO these are very special solutions and we don't actually need to
> > >> integrate one of them into Wicket.
> > >> Instead we can leave that decision to your application, by adding an
> > >> overridable method to InMemoryPageStore:
> > >>
> > >>       /**
> > >>        * Create a map to hold memory data for all sessions.
> > >>        *
> > >>        * @return a {@link ConcurrentHashMap} by default
> > >>        */
> > >>       protected Map<String, MemoryData> newMemoryMap()
> > >>       {
> > >>           return new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
> > >>       }
> > >>
> > >> (Yes, it would be called from the constructor which is a bad practice
> by
> > >> itself, but this is the simplest solution.)
> > >>
> > >> What do you think?
> > >>
> > >> Sven
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 12.04.20 10:34, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > >>> Hi Sven,
> > >>>
> > >>> That's good to hear! Please let me know when you have an
> implementation
> > >> and
> > >>> I'll give it another go.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thomas
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:01 PM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Thomas,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> actually not bad news at all (for Wicket 9 at least).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The old page manager implementation had so many special concepts and
> > >>>> solutions, it's easy to miss one.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A soft reference feature can easily be added/restored. I'm already
> > >>>> checking where it fits best.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks for your thorough testing.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best regards
> > >>>> Sven
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 11.04.20 10:58, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Bad news. My application was caught in a GC loop after running for
> 8
> > >>>> hours.
> > >>>>> The old generation was exhausted.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I couldn't get a heap dump at that time but restarted the
> > application,
> > >>>> took
> > >>>>> a heap dump after about an hour, and reverted back to Wicket 8.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The problem is this: The heap was full of objects referencing
> > >>>>> InMemoryPageStore, i.e. the in-memory 2nd-level cache for pages. My
> > >> first
> > >>>>> thought was that there is something wrong with the implementation
> of
> > >> that
> > >>>>> store and pages do not get limited or removed correctly.  So I
> > debugged
> > >>>>> it locally but everything is working fine.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Then I noticed that there are a lot of instances of Hibernate
> > entities
> > >> on
> > >>>>> the heap. So there definitely is an issue with models somewhere in
> my
> > >>>>> application. To be sure that this is not a new issue, I took
> another
> > >> heap
> > >>>>> dump from production - now running Wicket 8 again - and compared
> it.
> > >>>>> There are undetached entity models on the heap as well.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So why does it not OOM with Wicket 8? Well, the PerSessionPageStore
> > >>>>> (roughly the equivalent of InMemoryPageStore in Wicket 9) uses
> > >>>>> SoftReferences for storing pages. InMemoryPageStore does not and GC
> > >>>> cannot
> > >>>>> reclaim memory from it.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So while this surfaced some issues in my application that I just
> > >> fixed, I
> > >>>>> believe that InMemoryPageStore should use SoftReferences or another
> > >>>>> implementation based on SoftReferences should be added to Wicket
> 9. A
> > >>>> cache
> > >>>>> should not consume all the memory if it can easily re-fetch
> > >>>>> the value from persistent storage.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I guess the reason for not using SoftReferences in
> InMemoryPageStore
> > is
> > >>>>> that it can theoretically be used as a "persistent" store for
> pages.
> > If
> > >>>> that
> > >>>>> behavior is really required, I suggest adding another
> implementation
> > >>>> using
> > >>>>> SoftReferences.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:19 PM Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 4:01 PM Thomas Heigl <tho...@umschalt.com
> >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> FYI: I deployed Wicket 9.0.0-M5 to production an hour ago. 100k
> > >>>> requests
> > >>>>>>> served and no issues so far.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Awesome!
> > >>>>>> Thank you for testing it!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Great work!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 3:13 PM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Many thanks Maxim!
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Sven
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 08.04.20 14:29, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Released :)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 15:41, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> solomax...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> OK
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Will start new release process in couple of hours
> > >>>>>>>>>> Please stop me if you will find any blocker :)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 14:36, Thomas Heigl <
> tho...@umschalt.com>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> It works for me now!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:17 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>>>>>> solomax...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a million!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 14:10, Thomas Heigl <
> > tho...@umschalt.com>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing against the snapshot now. Will get back to you
> > >>>>>> shortly.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:53 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>>>>>>> solomax...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> M5 seems to be broken (deploy has failed more than 10
> times
> > >>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>> my
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build attempts)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have to start another release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please tell when can I start?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 07:01, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>>>>>> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Thomas,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please test M6-SNAPSHOT (so I don't have to release M5.2
> > >> :))))
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 02:39, Thomas Heigl <
> > >> tho...@umschalt.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be great. I want to do some more extensive
> > >> testing
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> then
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploy M5 into production. ;)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:50 PM Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> solomax...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can pack another release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later this week ...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 00:48, Thomas Heigl <
> > >>>>>> tho...@umschalt.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Sven!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did your changes make it into the release? Or did they
> > >> just
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> miss
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:43 PM Sven Meier <
> > >> s...@meiers.net>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, you're right:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff data stores missed some adjustments to
> the
> > >>>>>> latest
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> updates
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicket-core.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$DelegatedPage must
> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> serializable of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> course.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've pushed changes to wicketstuff master.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07.04.20 14:14, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And one more thing. There is now a warning logged
> just
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serialization:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARN o.a.w.pageStore.AsynchronousPageStore    :
> > >> Delegated
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> store
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'org.apache.wicket.pageStore.SerializingPageStore'
> > can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> not be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asynchronous
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:09 PM Thomas Heigl <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tho...@umschalt.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The cause is the following MetaData entry in the
> > >> session:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class
> > >>
> >
> org.wicketstuff.datastores.common.SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$1=org.wicketstuff.datastores.common.SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$SizeLimitedData@4090594a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 1:59 PM Thomas Heigl <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tho...@umschalt.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sven,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just found time to give this a try with Wicket
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 9.0.0-M5.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be issues with serialization now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My new config:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected IPageStore newCachingStore(IPageStore
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> pageStore) {
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return new CachingPageStore(pageStore, new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> InMemoryPageStore(getName(),
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MAX_PAGES_CACHED_PER_SESSION));
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected IPageStore newPersistentStore() {
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final RedissonRedisCache redisCache = new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RedissonRedisCache(redissonClient);
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final RedisDataStore redisDataStore = new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RedisDataStore(getName(),
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> redisCache, new RedisSettings());
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return new
> > >>>>>> SessionQuotaManagingDataStore(redisDataStore,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DATA_STORE_MAX_BYTES_PER_SESSION);
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This exception is logged after requests:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> org.springframework.data.redis.serializer.SerializationException:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cannot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serialize; nested exception is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> > org.springframework.core.serializer.support.SerializationFailedException:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed to serialize object using
> DefaultSerializer;
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> nested
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.io.NotSerializableException:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.wicketstuff.datastores.common.SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$DelegatedPage
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.data.redis.serializer.JdkSerializationRedisSerializer.serialize(JdkSerializationRedisSerializer.java:96)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.data.redis.core.AbstractOperations.rawHashValue(AbstractOperations.java:185)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.data.redis.core.DefaultHashOperations.putAll(DefaultHashOperations.java:147)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.data.redis.core.DefaultBoundHashOperations.putAll(DefaultBoundHashOperations.java:147)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.data.redis.RedisIndexedSessionRepository$RedisSession.saveDelta(RedisIndexedSessionRepository.java:795)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.data.redis.RedisIndexedSessionRepository$RedisSession.save(RedisIndexedSessionRepository.java:783)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.data.redis.RedisIndexedSessionRepository$RedisSession.access$000(RedisIndexedSessionRepository.java:670)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.data.redis.RedisIndexedSessionRepository.save(RedisIndexedSessionRepository.java:398)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.data.redis.RedisIndexedSessionRepository.save(RedisIndexedSessionRepository.java:249)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> com.myproject.session.InstrumentedFindByIndexNameSessionRepository.save(InstrumentedFindByIndexNameSessionRepository.java:29)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Method)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:344)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:198)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:163)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.aspectj.MethodInvocationProceedingJoinPoint.proceed(MethodInvocationProceedingJoinPoint.java:88)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> > io.micrometer.core.aop.TimedAspect.processWithTimer(TimedAspect.java:105)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>
> io.micrometer.core.aop.TimedAspect.timedMethod(TimedAspect.java:94)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor146.invoke(Unknown
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AbstractAspectJAdvice.invokeAdviceMethodWithGivenArgs(AbstractAspectJAdvice.java:644)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AbstractAspectJAdvice.invokeAdviceMethod(AbstractAspectJAdvice.java:633)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AspectJAroundAdvice.invoke(AspectJAroundAdvice.java:70)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:95)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:212)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy296.save(Unknown Source)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.web.http.SessionRepositoryFilter$SessionRepositoryRequestWrapper.commitSession(SessionRepositoryFilter.java:225)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.web.http.SessionRepositoryFilter$SessionRepositoryRequestWrapper.access$100(SessionRepositoryFilter.java:192)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.web.http.SessionRepositoryFilter.doFilterInternal(SessionRepositoryFilter.java:144)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.session.web.http.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:82)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:202)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:96)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:666)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:139)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:74)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:343)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:373)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:868)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.tomcat.util.net
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > .NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1594)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.tomcat.util.net
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> > org.springframework.core.serializer.support.SerializationFailedException:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed to serialize object using
> DefaultSerializer;
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> nested
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.io.NotSerializableException:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.wicketstuff.datastores.common.SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$DelegatedPage
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.core.serializer.support.SerializingConverter.convert(SerializingConverter.java:68)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.core.serializer.support.SerializingConverter.convert(SerializingConverter.java:35)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.springframework.data.redis.serializer.JdkSerializationRedisSerializer.serialize(JdkSerializationRedisSerializer.java:94)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 52 common frames omitted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.io.NotSerializableException:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.wicketstuff.datastores.common.SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$DelegatedPage
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does Wicket 9 try to serialize the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SessionQuotaManagingDataStore in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the session? Is this intended and does
> DelegatePage
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> simply
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement Serializable or shouldn't this be
> > serialized
> > >>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all? In
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket 8,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the corresponding PageData wasn't serializable
> > either
> > >> so
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> my
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this behavior is not intended.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using the following config for Wicket 8 and
> > there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> are no
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> such
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected IPageStore newPageStore(IDataStore
> > >> dataStore)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final ISerializer pageSerializer =
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getFrameworkSettings().getSerializer();
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return new PerSessionPageStore(pageSerializer,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> dataStore,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MAX_PAGES_CACHED_PER_SESSION);
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected IDataStore newDataStore() {
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final RedissonRedisCache redisCache = new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RedissonRedisCache(redissonClient.get());
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final RedisDataStore redisDataStore = new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RedisDataStore(redisCache,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RedisSettings());
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return new
> > >>>>>> SessionQuotaManagingDataStore(redisDataStore,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DATA_STORE_MAX_BYTES_PER_SESSION);
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 10:23 AM Thomas Heigl <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tho...@umschalt.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Sven!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks much better. I'll give it a try as
> soon
> > >> as I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> can.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:23 PM Sven Meier <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> s...@meiers.net
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your question comes at the right time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to improve the implementation with a
> > new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CachingPageStore:
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/8df3528dc44a08b7d375c20e764a3664cd6a5f30/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/DefaultPageManagerProvider.java#L145
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can now use InMemoryPageStore as a cache
> too.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27.03.20 09:34, Sven Meier wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I covered that usecase, but I will
> have
> > >> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> take
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for testing Wicket 9
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25.03.20 20:10, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the same approach could be used as for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> InSessionPageStore
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used as cache and a store:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/894799e01227781be76886b2d1cdb2a424c812e0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:35 PM Thomas Heigl <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tho...@umschalt.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged our master in our Wicket 9
> branch
> > >> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ran
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into an
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our current configuration with Wicket 8 looks
> > >> like
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> this:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageStore = PerSessionPageStore
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DataStore = RedisDataStore
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the page store keeps the last couple of
> > pages
> > >> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> session
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> memory
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Redis is used as a persistent store.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried to recreate this behavior with Wicket
> > 9:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SessionStore = InMemoryPageStore
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PersistentStore = RedisDataStore
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks correct, but it *does not work*
> > >> because
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> InMemoryPage
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> store
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implements AbstractPersistentPageStore and
> does
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *not*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegate to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next store in the chain.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we basically lost the option to use a
> memory
> > >>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> store in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> front
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistent store.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need this functionality because we are
> using
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Spring
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Session and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use the session as a page store.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would it be possible to add an InMemory store
> > >> that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegates
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> store in the chain? Or do I have to implement
> > it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> myself?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >>>>>> users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >> users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>>>>> users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to