On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jean-vinc...@drean.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean > <jean-vinc...@drean.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jerome Velociter >> <jerome.xw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guillaume Lerouge <guilla...@xwiki.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 for a better separation as well. I regularly give demos of XWiki and >>>> landing on a first page with all the technical spaces is indeed confusing >>>> for users. >> >> +1 for a better handling of hidden items in the wiki. >> >>> I agree. Maybe it's time we thing about typed spaces. >>> >>> It could start with something light such as a XWiki.SpaceClass with >>> only a "pretty name" (quite needed too if you ask me) and a "category" >>> list >>> >> >> We indeed need a pretty name for spaces and wikis (currently handled >> in wiki descriptors). I think this could go in the XWikiPreference >> class. Category ? Do we really need to categorize spaces which already >> are categories ? >> > > Ok I read too fast. If the category is here to be able to mark a space > as technical, I think it's like using a bazooka to kill a fly
No I think it could be more than that. You could have spaces of type "Content", of type "User space", of type "Application" or "Application code", etc. >. WDYT > about hiding spaces to basic users when all the pages within the space > are hidden ? (of course the hidden page feature would need to be > finished, we'd need APIs to retrieve them for advanced users). That would work. Jerome > > Thanks, > JV. > _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
