Did you open a bug? paul > dullfig <mailto:da...@grmcompany.com> > 22 April 2016 at 17:48 > well there are a couple of issues here. First, there are still > browsers that don't support svg (although they are only a few and not > the main ones). Second, there is a bug in the SVG macro that prevents > links in certain browsers, like Chrome. So if SVG support was native > and transparent, then your experience would be even across the board. > > Dan > > From: Paul Libbrecht-2 [via XWiki] > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:05 PM > To: dullfig > Subject: Re: XWiki, SVG and Apache Batik > > Hello Dan, > > I believe the Batik library is used for printing to PDF only, but I > could well be wrong. > > You can use an SVG image that you upload as you would upload a png > image. This will simply embed it within the html page and let the > browser render it. This works since recent versions of XWiki (maybe 6?). > I doubt this uses Batik. > > Isn't that sufficient? > At least, to my eyes, this is a very important use case for all the > technical documentation we write. > > Paul > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/XWiki-SVG-and-Apache-Batik-tp7599123p7599133.html > > To unsubscribe from XWiki, SVG and Apache Batik, click here. > NAML > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/XWiki-SVG-and-Apache-Batik-tp7599123p7599152.html > Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Paul Libbrecht <mailto:p...@hoplahup.net> > 22 April 2016 at 08:05 > Hello Dan, > > I believe the Batik library is used for printing to PDF only, but I > could well be wrong. > > You can use an SVG image that you upload as you would upload a png > image. This will simply embed it within the html page and let the > browser render it. This works since recent versions of XWiki (maybe 6?). > I doubt this uses Batik. > > Isn't that sufficient? > At least, to my eyes, this is a very important use case for all the > technical documentation we write. > > Paul > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > dullfig <mailto:da...@grmcompany.com> > 21 April 2016 at 17:54 > It is my understanding that XWiki includes the Apache Batik library to > handle > SVG content, so my question is why does XWiki not handle SVG content > natively (without the SVG Macro), and why does the browser have to support > SVG? With Batik, shouldn't XWiki be able to render the SVG without the > help > of the browers? > > Dan > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/XWiki-SVG-and-Apache-Batik-tp7599123.html > Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
