Agreed, The longer you leave it, the longer people might use it instead of the official. As of today, the official isn't even the first to appear in the list when you search for xwiki in dockerhub (but I suspect this will soon change as people start pulling it).
And people who already have pulled it won't be affected aside from the fact that they won't get updates, so no impact for them. Regards, Denis 2017-02-09 11:40 GMT+01:00 Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net>: > Ok so now that we have an official xwiki image on dockerhub at > https://hub.docker.com/_/xwiki/ we need to decide what we do with > https://hub.docker.com/r/xwiki/xwiki-mysql-tomcat/ > > I think we should remove it to avoid confusion. > > Anyone having any issue with me removing it now? WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > On 16 Jan 2017, at 18:37, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I’ve started a first version of a XWiki docker packaging at > https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/docker-xwiki and I’ve created an > automated build on DockerHub at https://hub.docker.com/u/xwiki/. The goal > is to provide an official packaging done by the XWiki dev team. > > > > Since I’m a recent user of Docker I’m sure I’ve made plenty of mistakes > and not following some best practices, even though I’ve tried my best to do > that ;) > > > > So it would be great if: > > * Some users could try it out and let me know how it works > > * Users could tell me what they’d expect in term of setup from a docker > distribution. > > * Some Docker experts review my code and let me know what I should > improve! > > > > After I receive some confirmation that it works well-enough, my goal is > to document it as an official way of installing xwiki on xwiki.org. > > > > Feel free to create jiras for ideas and bugs at > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XDOCKER. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > -Vincent > > > > PS: Note that I’m sure some will want a different DB, such as postgreSQL > for example. That should be easy to do. Pull request accepted! :) > > > >
