YMMV and I don’t think my approach will work for your use case.
Here is a suggestion based on what I’ve done. In the first paragraph you can
register tables with code as such.
%spark
val example = sqlContext.read.format("jdbc").options(
Map("url" -> "jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/db_name",
"driver" -> "org.postgresql.Driver",
"user" -> “user_name",
"password" -> “password",
"dbtable" -> “example" )).load()
assets.createOrReplaceTempView(“example")
Subsequently using spark.sql (limited to SQL syntax/semantics) supported by
Spark. If there are Postgres specific features or some advanced SQL
functions/syntax, this approach may not work for you.
%spark.sql
select * from example
The rest of the reports/visuals exports to CSV will look identical.
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Benjamin Kim <bbuil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We are using the JDBC interpreter. The business analysts only know SQL and
> run ad-hoc queries for their report exports to CSV.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
>
>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 2:21 PM, t p <tauis2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Are you using JDBC or the PSQL interpreter? I had encountered something
>> similar while using the PSQL interpreter and I had to restart Zeppelin.
>>
>> My experience using PSQL (Postgresql, HAWK) was not as good as using
>> spark/scala wrappers (JDBC data source) to connect via JDBC and then
>> register temp tables. This approach allowed me to work with dynamic forms in
>> a more meaningful way e.g. use SQL results to create a new drop down to
>> drive the next page etc…
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Benjamin Kim <bbuil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We are getting “out of shared memory” errors when multiple users are
>>> running SQL queries against our PostgreSQL DB either simultaneously or
>>> throughout the day. When this happens, Zeppelin 0.6.0 becomes unresponsive
>>> for any more SQL queries. It looks like this is being caused by too many
>>> locks being taken and not released, transactions never closing, and/or
>>> connections never closing. Has anyone encountered Zeppelin 0.6.0 such an
>>> issue as this? If so, is there a solution for it?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>
>
