+1. Yes, agreed I too think its overhead, and all the features can be achieved via JDBCInterpreter.
On 23 January 2017 at 10:45, Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We, currently, have two kind of Interpreter supporting to connect DB which > are PostgresqlInterpreter and JDBCInterpreter. In history, JDBCInterpreter > is based on PostgresqlInterpeter and has the same function with it. I > suggest to remove PostgrsqlInterpreter in Zeppelin's code base because they > have same functions and JDBCInterpreter is now de facto standard. All new > contribution based on JDBC function is provided and added onto > JDBCInterpreter. In old times, I suggested same thing but it wouldn't be > accepted because PostgresqlInterpreter was better then JDBCInterpreter at > that time. But, now, JDBCInterpreter include all functions of > PostgresqlInterpreter and provide better functions. > > How do you guys think of it? If it's accepted, 0.8.0 won't have > PostgresqlInterpreter anymore. > > Regards, > Jongyoul Lee > > -- > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 > http://madeng.net > -- Warm Regards, Prabhjyot Singh
